When It Comes to Climate Change, Don't Confuse Beliefs with Facts: The Business Cost of Reality Denial
- Marie Horodecki Aymes
- Feb 13
- 3 min read
In 2024, Mediterranean olive oil prices shattered records due to undeniable climate realities. The numbers tell a compelling story: Spain's harvest declined by more than 50%, plummeting from a five-year average of approximately 1.3 million metric tons to merely 620,000 metric tons. Global olive oil production for 2023–2024 reached 2.407 million tons, its lowest level since 2013–2014.
Yet, despite these clear market signals, some corporate leaders and policymakers—particularly in the U.S. (Lets say Donald Trump and his friends) —continue to oppose
climate action.
The reality, however, remains unavoidable: Climate change is actively reshaping industries, supply chains, and financial markets. Denying this reality does not exempt businesses from its consequences.
Climate Change & Market Forces: The Market Doesn't Care About Your Opinion
Economic forces continue to respond to climate change, regardless of belief or political stance. Consider these undeniable market shifts:
The olive oil crisis has led to unprecedented scarcity and price surges. Severe droughts and heatwaves across Spain, Italy, and Greece have driven global supply to its lowest point in a decade.
Coffee futures have reached near 50-year highs as Brazil, the world's largest coffee producer, grapples with prolonged droughts and heatwaves.
Cocoa prices in London have skyrocketed from $3,182 per tonne to $11,530 in June 2024—a direct result of drought and erratic rainfall in West Africa, which produces 60% of the world's cocoa.
Florida's citrus production has collapsed dramatically. Climate-driven hurricanes and the spread of citrus greening disease have reduced orange production from 242 million boxes in 2003-04 to an estimated 12 million boxes in 2023-24—a staggering 95% decline.
The Cost of Choosing Ideology Over Business Reality
When businesses prioritize ideological alignment over CSR adaptation, the consequences become measurable and significant.
Lost supplier relationships
Lost supplier relationships have become increasingly common. Hard data from 2024 reveals that over 40 fashion suppliers, including those working with major brands like Mango, H&M, and Levi's, had their climate commitments revoked by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). The consequence? Strained relationships with environmentally conscious brands and consumers have led to lost contracts and restricted market access.
Insurance costs have surged dramatically.
The 2025 Los Angeles wildfires resulted in quantifiable damages of $250-275 billion. California's FAIR Plan's unprecedented $1 billion request from private insurers demonstrates how climate-related disasters are driving insurance costs skyward, regardless of political stance.
Regulatory compliance
Regulatory compliance penalties have become more severe. The European Union's 2024 sustainability regulations aren't optional—they carry substantial financial penalties. Companies choosing political positioning over adaptation now face concrete fines and market access restrictions.
Reputational damage
Reputational damage has begun affecting sales directly. In January 2025, shareholders representing $266 billion in assets formally challenged Walmart's retreat from DEI initiatives. This wasn't about politics—it was about business risk. Investors explicitly warned about negative impacts on stability and long-term financial returns.
“Walmart has not offered a financial or business case for this change in policy,”
investors, in the letter dated Jan. 14.
The Market Reality of Short-Term Thinking
The data clearly shows that delaying climate adaptation only increases costs:
Insurance premiums in climate-vulnerable regions have risen by 30-40% annually. Property insurance has become increasingly difficult to secure in high-risk areas.
Supply chain disruptions have created cascading effects throughout global markets. The cocoa industry provides a telling example:
Market Disruption:
West African drought and erratic rainfall affected 60% of global cocoa supply
Prices surged from $3,182 to $11,530 per tonne (June 2024)
Corporate Impact (Nestle Case Study):
Despite price increases driving 2.2% organic sales growth in 2024, sales volumes declined as consumers sought alternatives
Profit margins contracted as cocoa price increases outpaced pricing adjustments
Required significant investments in supply chain resilience and sustainability
These impacts show how climate-related supply chain disruptions create cascading effects:
Rising input costs
Margin compression
Volume decline
Forced strategic adaptation
Long-term investment requirements
The market prices these risks regardless of political stance on climate change, forcing companies to adapt or face financial consequences.
Reality Doesn't Negotiate
The choice isn't between believing or not believing in climate change and more globally in CSR. It's between adapting to documented market realities or facing the measurable consequences of denial.
This case is a stark warning: the world cannot afford climate and social policies driven by ideology rather than science and economic pragmatism. Businesses need stability and long-term commitment from governments to drive the green transition—not politically motivated policy reversals that destabilize progress.
For business leaders, the choice isn't between believing or not believing in climate change and more globally in CSR. It's between adapting to documented market realities or facing the measurable consequences of denial. The market will continue to price climate risk, whether we acknowledge it or not.
mond blowing !